The Order Diagnostics of the Organizational Culture: the Validation of the Scale of Diagnostic of the Degree of Expressiveness of Suborders of Organizational Culture


The purpose of the article is to clarify the psychometric properties of the scale of diagnostic of the degree of expressiveness of suborders of organizational culture. The cross-sectoral design data (N=85) collected in industrial enterprises. The average years of employees includes into research is 48.9. Correlation analyses, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed the existence of the family, army and church suborders and the validity of the scale of diagnostic of the degree of expressiveness of suborders of organizational culture (The Cronbach alpha 0,784, 0,822, 0,800). The management interaction determining the formation of a family suborders is characterized by such features of management style of managers as trust of subordinates, delegation of responsibilities, creation of a team, good knowledge of managers of their subordinates, encouragement for well-executed work and people orientation, openness and friendliness of managers in relation to staff, the desire to interact with people, the ability to establish contact and understand personal needs of employees. For the army suborder (it is dominant in our sample), the managerial activity is focus on controlling function, following the schedule, striving for detailed fulfillment of the task, knowledge of the organization's policy, detailed planning of the work process. The church suborder is characterized by the trust of subordinates to managers, good relationships based on trust. The trust relationships inherent in the church suborder allows to get better results from the work of the staff, to join the group to solve complex tasks, to avoid conflicts, and to regulate it effectively if it is arise.

  1. Anderson C., Spataro S.E.; Flynn F.J. (2008). Personality and Organizational Culture as Determinants of Influence. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 93. N 3. Pp. 702-710.
  2. Bloor G., Dawson P. (1994). Understanding Professional Culture in Organizational Context. Organization Studies. № 15. Pp. 275 – 295.
  3. Cohen A. (2007). One Nation, Many Cultures: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Relationship between Personal Cultural Values and Commitment in the Workplace to In-Role Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Cross-Cultural Research. № 41. Pp. 273 – 300.
  4. Chao G.T., Moon H. (2005). The Cultural Mosaic: A Metatheory for Understanding the Complexity of Culture. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 90. N 6. Pp. 1128-1140.
  5. Basten F.M.R.C (2001). The Role of Metaphors in (Re)producing Organizational Culture. Advances in Developing Human Resource. № 3. Pp. 344 – 354.
  6. Bastien D.T (1992). Change in Organizational Culture: The Use of Linguistic Methods in a Corporate Acquisition. Management Communication Quarterly. № 5. Pp. 403 – 442.
  7. Hofstede G. (2001). Culture`s Consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 596 p.
  8. Hofstede G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). (Accessed 02, December, 2017)
  9. Schein E.H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed). San Francisco, John Wiley & Son. 437 p.
  10. Ruttinger R. (1992). Culture of entrepreneurship. Moscow: ECOM. 240 p. (in Russian).
  11. Cameron K.S, Quinn P.E. (2001). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture Based on The Competing Values Framework. Sankt Petersburg: Piter. 320 p. (in Russian).
  12. Trompenaars F., Hampden-Turner C. (2004). National-cultural differences in the context of global business: popular science ed. Minsk: Potpourri. 528 p. (in Russian).
  13. Geertz K. (2004). Interpretation of Cultures. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 560 p. (in Russian).
  14. Melnikova O.G., Horoshilov D.A. (2015). Strategies for the Validation of Qualitative Research in Psychology. Psychological research. Vol. 8 N 44. Pp. 1-7. Available at: (Accessed 02, December, 2017).
  15. Aksenovskaya L.N. (2005). The Order Concept of Organizational Culture: the Issues of Methodology. Saratov: Publishing House of the SSU. 348 p. (in Russian).
  16. Aksenovskaya L.N. (2007). Order Model of Organizational Culture. Moscow: Academic project. 303 p. (in Russian).
  17. Aksenovskaya L.N. (2016). Order Organizational Culture Diagnostics. Saratov: Nauka. 190 p. (in Russian).
  18. Aksenovskaya L.N., Nesterova K.S. (2017). English-Russian Dictionary of the Order Approach to the Social Psychological Study of Organizational Culture. Saratov: Nauka. P.10 (in Russian).
  19. Ulanovsky A. (2008). Phenomenology as a Style of Research and Practice. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. Ed. by Y. Zinchenko & V. Petrenko. Moscow: Department of Psychology, MSU & IG-SOCIN (in Russian).
  20. Chiker V.A. (2004). Psychological Diagnostics of the Organization and Staff. Sankt Petersburg: Rech. 176 p. (in Russian).
  21. Nasledov A.N. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional Statistical Analysis of Data. Sankt Petersburg: Piter. 416 p. (in Russian).
стр. 7

© 2013 International Annual Edition of Applied Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice