Prognostic Systematization. Development of a Test Task for Identifying Individual Style Features of Organizational Activities

Abstract

The idea of this test task was born because of the need for human resources and specialized services (HR – human resources) to have a prognostic technique in its arsenal that would provide more or less reliable information about psychological characteristics of new and old employees. Our observations and expert assessments that we used to discuss this topic state that about 20-25% of newcomers experience difficulties in adapting to a new workplace due to the fact that their individual characteristics make it difficult for them to contact the “aborigines” (employees that have been with the company for a longer period of time) and irritate their colleagues. They do not always meet the requirements of a particular working environment. The conflict traumatizes both the team and the novice, but it could have been avoided if they had been prepared to face them in advance.

Bibliography
  1. Avgustevich S.I. (2017). Materials for the Organization of Observation of the Fulfillment of the Experimental Assignment for Systematization. Saratov. (in Russian).
  2. Zinchenko V.P., Morgunov Ye.B. (1994). The Man Upcoming. Sketches of Russian Psychology. Moscow, Trivola Publ. 304 p. (in Russian).
  3. Merlin V.S. (1986). Essay on the integral study of individuality. Moscow: Pedagogika. (in Russian).
  4. Shkuratova I.P. (2002). Style Approach to the Study of Personality: Problems and Prospects. Individual and stylistic features of personality. Rostov-on-Don, YURGI. P.29-45. (in Russian).
  5. Shkupatova I.P. (1994). Cognitive Style and Communication. Rostov-on-Don. Publishing house of Rostov Pedagogical University (in Russian).
  6. Shkuratova I.P. (1998).Study of style in psychology: opposition or consolidation. Human Style: Psychological Analysis. Ed. A.V. Libin. Moscow: Smysl. P. 13-33. (in Russian).
  7. Aksenovskaya L.N. (2005). Order Concept of Organizational Culture: Methodology Issues. Saratov: Publishing house of Saratov University. 348 p. (in Russian).
  8. Aksenovskaya L.N. (2007). Order Model of Organizational Culture: Monograph. Moscow: Academic project: “Triksta”. 303 p. (in Russian).
  9. Shvantsara J. (1978). Diagnosis of Mental Development. Prague: Avitsenum. 388 p. (in Russian).
  10. Vikhanskiy O.S., Naumov A.I. (2003). Management. Moscow: Ekonomist. 528 p. (in Russian).
  11. Karpov A.V. (2005). Psychology of Management. Moscow, Gardariki. (in Russian).
  12. Rybakov M. (2013). How to Establish Order in Your Business. How to Build a Reliable System of Unreliable Elements. Workshop. Moscow, IKAR Publishing. (in Russian).
  13. Klimov Ye.A. (1982). Individual style of activity. The Psychology of Individual Differences. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU. Pp. 74-77. (in Russian).
  14. Merlin V.S. (1982). Individual System of Activity as a Mediating Link in the Links between the Different Levels of Individuality. Problems of personality psyche. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  15. Yefremova T.F. (2000). New Dictionary of Russian. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk. (in Russian).
  16. Bim-Bad B.M. (2002). Pedagogical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: The Great Russian Encyclopedia. 528 p. (in Russian).
  17. Collegiate Dictionary of Psychology and Pedagogy. (2013). Moscow. Available at: http://psychology_pedagogy.academic.ru (Accessed 15, May, 2017).
  18. Zinchenko A.P., Kraychinskaya S.B. i dr. (2016). The Technology of Systemic Thinking: the Experience of Applying and Translating the Technology of System Thinking. Moscow, Alpina Didzhital. 330 p. (in Russian).
стр. 25
Text in pdf: 

© 2013 International Annual Edition of Applied Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice