English
РусскийCreating Team-Learning and Proactivity by Expanding Job Design Practises within Lean Production
Аннотация:
Lean production and team-work are based on seemingly opposing principles of job design, and yet often combined in production systems within industry. In this study we explored conditions for team learning and proactive behaviour within one specific context and version of the lean concept; the Volvo Production System (VPS). The aim of the study was to identify job design practises that promote learning in teams in a leaned production system, and identify organizational barriers for team learning in order to promote teams’ proactive behaviour. The results are based on quantitative analysis of a) work task analysis of cognitive demand in standardized and non-standardized tasks, a questionnaire to all employees on the shop-floor, production-leaders’ ratings of team proactivity, and b) qualitative analysis of interviews with specialists from support functions and production leaders. Standardized tasks, regardless of cognitive demand, do not impact team learning processes or proactivity. Mediation analysis on aggregated data (a) consisting of 41 teams showed that cognitive demand in the most demanding task in the non-standardized work was fully mediated by team learning processes on proactivity and that inter-team collaboration was mediated by team-learning processes on proactivity. A conclusion is that the potential for team-learning processes and proactivity lies in those work activities that are not standardized, and good inter-team collaboration in the work-flow. The non-standardized tasks take very little time, and are not more cognitively demanding than the main tasks, and yet impact team proactivity to a considerable extent as they give input to building a shared meaning of work. The tentative qualitative results (b) show differences between stake-holders input to stagnant and vibrant teams. The main difference is between thinking teamwork or individual work, expanding work into joint problem-solving or defining divided and clear-cut work roles, in the coordination of different support functions activities, and if teams are involved in prioritizing what should be done.
[1] Peterson, P., Johansson, O., Broman, M., Blücher, D., & Alsterman, H. (2010). Lean: Turn deviations into success. Malmö, Sweden: Part Development AB.
[2] North, K., & Güldenberg, S. (2008). Produktive Wissensarbeit(er) [Productive knowledgework(ers)].Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
[3] Strauss, K., Griffin, M.A., & Raffety, A.E. (2009). Proactivity directed towards the team and the organization: the role of leadership, commitment and role-breath self-efficacy. British Journal of Management, 20, 279-291. [4] Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 3, 435-462.
[5] Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., & Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork Behaviours: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37; 540 – 568.
[6] Savelsbergh,C.M.J.H., Van der Heijden, B. M.J.M, & Poell, R.F. (2009) Measurement instrument for team-learning behaviours. The development and empirical validation of an multi-dimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviours. Small group research, 40, 578-607.
[7] Wilson, J.M., Goodman, P., and Cronin, M.A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1041-1059.
[8] Billet, S. (2008). Workplace participatory practices. Conceptualising workplaces as learning envireonments. Journal of workplace learning, 16, 312-324.
[9] Decuper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning; An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111-133.
[10] West, M. A., Hirst, G., Richter, A., & Shipton, H. (2004). Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 269-299.
[11] Lantz, A. (2011). Teamwork on the line can pay off down the line. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2, 75 – 96.
[12] Kozlowski, S.W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R.J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, 333-375. NJ: Wiley.
[13] Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 12, 105-130.
[14] Lantz. A. (2013). The role of supportive leadership for proactive behavior and self-organization in work groups. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations, 3, 19-35.
[15] Morgeson, F.P., & Humphrey, S.E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ); Developing and validating a a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321 – 1339.
[16] Antoni, C. H. (2005b). Effects of team task structure on team clime for innovation and team outcomes. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies - Journal of IET Research Centre, 9-17.
[17] Woods, S.A., &West, M.A. (2010). The psychology of work and organizations. Singapore: Seng Lee Press.
[18] Richter, P., Hemman, E., & Pohlandt, A. (1999). Objective task analysis and the prediction of Mental workload: Results of the application of an action-oriented software tool (REBA). In M. Wiethoff & F. R. H. Zijlstra (Eds.), New approaches for modern problems in work psychology, 67-76. Series: WORC report 99.10.001. Tilburg, the Netherlands: University Press.
[19] West, M.A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 51, 355-424.
[20] Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
[21] Hirst, G., & Mann, L. (2004). A model of R&D leadership and team communication: The relationship within project management. R&D management, 34, 147-160.
[22] Hetzner, S., Heid, H., & Gruber, H (2012). Change at work and professional learning: how readiness to change, self-determination and personal initiative affect individual learning through reflection. European Journal of Psychology Education, 27, 539 – 555.
[23] Lantz, A., & Brav, A. (2007). Job design for learning in work groups. Journal of Workplace Learning, 5, 269-285.
[24] Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In K. J Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[25] James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of applied psychology, 69(1), 85.
[26] Morrison Wolfe, E.W., and Phelps, C. (1999). Taking charge; Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 5-28.
[27] Miles, M..B., & Huberman, M.A (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. New York: Sage.
