Psychology of Risk and Risk Perception: Theoretical Aspect in Decision-Making

The risk concept, dual nature of risk, risk perception is presented in the paper. Different models of risk perception are shown. Theoretical aspects of risk perception in the decision-making process are considered. The importance of the issue in the financial decision-making is noted.

  1. Gregory, R., Flynn, J.; Slovic, P. (1995) Technological Stigma. American Scientist, Research Triangle Park, NC. Vol. 83, pp. 220-223.
  2. Slovic, P. et al. (2000) Nuclear Power and the Public: A Comparative Study of Risk Perception in France and the United States. Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: a Survey of Empirical Studies. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press. Pp. 55-102.
  3. Webster, N. (1983) Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary. New York: Simon & Schuster. 2308 pp.
  4. Funtowicz, S.O.; Ravetz, J.R. (1992) Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Praeger. pp. 251-273.
  5. Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (1992) Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. 432 pp.
  6. Otway, H. (1992) Public Wisdom, Expert Fallibility: Toward a Contextual Theory of Risk. Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CT: Praeger. pp. 215-228.
  7. Cohen, B.L. (1985) Criteria for Technology Acceptability. Risk Analysis. New Jersey, Vol. 5, No. 1, Mar., pp. 1-3.
  8. Barabanschikov, V.A. (2014) Perception of Complex Socially Significant Objects During Fast Eye Movements of an Observer. Experimental Psychology. Vol. 7. No 2. pp. 5-25. (in Russian).
  9. Kochetkov, V.V. and Skotnikova, I.G. (1993) Individual Psychological Problems of Decision-Making. Moscow: Nauka. P. 52. (in Russian).
  10. Kholodnaya, M.A. (1997) The Psychology of Intelligence: The Paradoxes of Research. Tomsk: TGU; Moscow: Bars. P. 392. (in Russian).
  11. Shkuratova, I.P. (1997) Cognitive Style as a Factor in the Success of Learning and Communication in the Educational Field. Personality in Activity and Communication. Rostov-on-Don: Hephaestus. Pp. 115-128. (in Russian).
  12. Witkin, H.A. (1950). Individual Differences in Ease of Perception of Embedded Figures. Journal of Personality. 19, Pp. 1-15.
  13. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica. 47, pp. 263-291.
  14. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5. Pp. 297-323.
  15. Solntseva, G.N. (2007) Psychological Mechanisms and Models of "Risk Behavior". Works of ISA. Vol. 31. Pp. 231-244.
  16. Ilyin, E.P. (2012) Psychology of Risk. St. Petersburg: Peter, p. 267. (in Russian).
  17. Hayhoe, M., and Ballard, D. (2005). Eye Movements in Natural Behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 9, pp. 188-194.
  18. Tatler, B.W., Hayhoe, M.M., Land, M.F., and Ballard, D.H. (2011). Eye Guidance in Natural Vision: Reinterpreting Salience. J. Vis. 11 (5), 5.
  19. Gottlieb, J. (2012). Attention, Learning, and the Value of Information. Neuron. Vol. 76, pp. 281-295.
  20. Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39(5). Pp. 806-820.
  21. Slovic, P. (2000). Risk, society, and policy series. The perception of risk. London, England: Earthscan Publications. Pp. 220-231.
  22. Coleman, C.L. (1993). The Influence of Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication on Societal and Personal Risk Judgments. Communication Research. 20, pp. 611-628.
  23. Peters, R.G., Covello, V.T. and McCallum, D.B. (1997) The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 17(1). Pp. 43-54.
  24. Sandman, P.M. (1989) Hazard Versus Outrage in the Public Perception of Risk. Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations. New York: Plenum Press. Pp. 3-16.
  25. Walaski, P. (2011) Risk and Crisis Communication: Methods and Messages. New York: Wiley.
стр. 9
Text in pdf: 

© 2013 International Annual Edition of Applied Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice