Personal Representations of “I – Other” Interaction: Socio-Psychological Analysis and Empirical Study

Аннотация:

 

The author makes the case for categorization of the construct “personal representations “I – other” interaction”. It helps studying the subject which is included into the system of interpersonal and intergroup relations, interactions with Others - through personal identity construction with the help of mechanisms of finding similarities / differences between self and Other, self-identification via dialogue / polylogue with the Different, complication and differentiation of Self, understanding stranger’s motive. The article contains the main points of the author’s concept “personal representations of “I – other” interaction”, and also the description of empirical research project. There is the detailed description of one of the technologies of operationalization of inter-subjective interaction “I – other” experience, which is based on the qualitative phenomenological approach and is aimed at the reconstruction of inter-subjective space of personality with the help of analyzing the meanings, relations and feelings. The results verify the main points of the concept and justify the relevance and predictive value of the established research technique.

Practical aspect of the studied problem can be used in diagnostic programs, in reaching practical aims for optimization of real interpersonal and intergroup interactions and interrelations, and also for developing balanced personal identity.

Литература

1.    Asmolov A.G. Po tu storonu soznanija: Metodologicheskie problemy ne-klassicheskoj psihologii (On that party of consciousness: Methodological problems of nonclassical psychology). M.: Smysl, 2002. – 480 s.

2.    Vasiljuk F.E. Metodologicheskij analiz v psihologii (The methodological analysis in psychology). M.: MGPPU; Smysl, 2003. – 240 s.

3.    Gusel'ceva M.S. Jevoljucija psihologicheskogo znanija v smene tipov racional'nosti (istoriko-metodologicheskoe issledovanie) (Evolution of psychological knowledge in change of types of rationality (historical and methodological research)). M., 2013 – 366s.

4.    Gergen K.J. Realities and Relationships. — Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.

5.    Dzherdzhen K. Dzh. Social'nyj konstrukcionizm: znanie i praktika (Social konstruktsionizm: knowledge and practice). — Minsk: BGU, 2003.

6.    Leont'ev D. A. Neklassicheskij vektor v sovremennoj psihologii (Nonclassical vector in modern psychology) // Postneklassicheskaja psihologija. Social'nyj konstrukcionizm i narrativnyj podhod (Post-nonclassical psychology. Social konstruktsionizm and narrative approach). 2005. № 1(2). S.51–71.

7.    Jurevich A.V. Psihologija i metodologija (Psychology and methodology). M., 2005. – 312 s.

8.    Ryaguzova E.V. Lichnostnye reprezentacii vzaimodejstvija «Ja – Drugoj»: social'no-psihologicheskij analiz. Diss. na soisk. uch. stepeni d-ra psihologicheskih nauk (“Personal representations of “I – Other” interaction: socio-psychological analysis). Saratov, 2012. 470р.

9.    Ulanovskij A.M. Fenomenologicheskaja psihologija: kachestvennye issle-dovanija i rabota s perezhivaniem (Phenomenological psychology: high-quality researches and work with experience). M., 2012. – 255s.

стр. 10

© 2013 International Annual Edition of Applied Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice